The present essay analyzes the dogmatic development of the special relationship between the parties of a precontractual bargaining in the case of fault by an employee acting for his employer. The starting point is the famous Linoleumteppich-Entscheidung, from which a profound doctrinal reflection subsequently arises to address the silence on the issue of the BGB, culminating in the Schuldrechtsreform’s (2002) regulation of the new § 311.
Il caso del rotolo di linoleum (RG, 7 dicembre 1911). All’origine della responsabilità precontrattuale “allargata”
Favale Rocco
2024-01-01
Abstract
The present essay analyzes the dogmatic development of the special relationship between the parties of a precontractual bargaining in the case of fault by an employee acting for his employer. The starting point is the famous Linoleumteppich-Entscheidung, from which a profound doctrinal reflection subsequently arises to address the silence on the issue of the BGB, culminating in the Schuldrechtsreform’s (2002) regulation of the new § 311.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Favale R., Il caso del rotolo di linoleum, EuDP, 2024.pdf
solo gestori di archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
348.47 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
348.47 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.