The present essay analyzes the dogmatic development of the special relationship between the parties of a precontractual bargaining in the case of fault by an employee acting for his employer. The starting point is the famous Linoleumteppich-Entscheidung, from which a profound doctrinal reflection subsequently arises to address the silence on the issue of the BGB, culminating in the Schuldrechtsreform’s (2002) regulation of the new § 311.

Il caso del rotolo di linoleum (RG, 7 dicembre 1911). All’origine della responsabilità precontrattuale “allargata”

Favale Rocco
2024-01-01

Abstract

The present essay analyzes the dogmatic development of the special relationship between the parties of a precontractual bargaining in the case of fault by an employee acting for his employer. The starting point is the famous Linoleumteppich-Entscheidung, from which a profound doctrinal reflection subsequently arises to address the silence on the issue of the BGB, culminating in the Schuldrechtsreform’s (2002) regulation of the new § 311.
2024
262
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Favale R., Il caso del rotolo di linoleum, EuDP, 2024.pdf

solo gestori di archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 348.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
348.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11581/485043
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact