The ability of three commercial inulins (Raftilose ®P95, Frutafit IQ®, and Frutafit TEX®) with different chemical composition (oligo-polysaccharides profile) to form gels (at 25 and 50 °C) was evaluated. Raftilose®P95 (rich in mono-disaccharides) did not form gels, Frutafit IQ® (mainly oligosaccharides) gelatinized in the 30-60% w/w concentration range and Frutafit TEX® (mainly long-chain saccharides) in the 20-40% w/w range. Textural and thermal properties of the gels were studied and their stability was evaluated during storage at 4 °C. Frutafit TEX® gels (both fresh and during storage) were harder, more adhesive, and less cohesive than Frutafit IQ® gels (40% w/w). At 40% w/w, Frutafit TEX® gels had a significantly higher amount of freezable water than Frutafit IQ®, and the DSC thermogram line shapes indicated that ice melting was more uniform and occurred at higher temperatures in Frutafit TEX® than in the Frutafit IQ® gels. Ice melting profile was not significantly affected by both gelification temperature and storage time. Frutafit IQ® gels were more stable than Frutafit TEX® gels during storage.

Physicochemical characterization and stability of inulin gels

Vittadini, Elena;
2006-01-01

Abstract

The ability of three commercial inulins (Raftilose ®P95, Frutafit IQ®, and Frutafit TEX®) with different chemical composition (oligo-polysaccharides profile) to form gels (at 25 and 50 °C) was evaluated. Raftilose®P95 (rich in mono-disaccharides) did not form gels, Frutafit IQ® (mainly oligosaccharides) gelatinized in the 30-60% w/w concentration range and Frutafit TEX® (mainly long-chain saccharides) in the 20-40% w/w range. Textural and thermal properties of the gels were studied and their stability was evaluated during storage at 4 °C. Frutafit TEX® gels (both fresh and during storage) were harder, more adhesive, and less cohesive than Frutafit IQ® gels (40% w/w). At 40% w/w, Frutafit TEX® gels had a significantly higher amount of freezable water than Frutafit IQ®, and the DSC thermogram line shapes indicated that ice melting was more uniform and occurred at higher temperatures in Frutafit TEX® than in the Frutafit IQ® gels. Ice melting profile was not significantly affected by both gelification temperature and storage time. Frutafit IQ® gels were more stable than Frutafit TEX® gels during storage.
2006
262
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Chiavaro2007_Article_PhysicochemicalCharacterizatio.pdf

solo gestori di archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 441.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
441.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11581/424795
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 98
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 78
social impact