The exponential growth of the human population and associated intensifications in animal farming, pet ownership, and habitat anthropisation have dramatically increased human-animal interactions. Global livestock production now exceeds 24 billion animals annually, and pet ownership has risen to over 70% of households in many developed nations, creating unprecedented interfaces for viral exchange. This heightened contact has multiplied opportunities for zoonotic and reverse-zoonotic transmission, as tragically exemplified by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The fecal virome—defined as the totality of viral nucleic acids in the gastrointestinal tract—represents a crucial, yet largely unexplored, pathway for such exchanges. While the bacterial microbiome’s role is increasingly recognized, the virome’s composition, dynamics, and transmissibility between co-habiting humans and animals remain poorly characterized. This review compiles current evidence on the fecal virome of key domestic animals (equines, livestock, pets) and their human contacts under the “One Health” framework. We critically evaluate methodological approaches—from targeted PCR to viral metagenomics—and highlight the discovery of novel viruses and identification of zoonotic agents through metagenomic approaches. Critically, we identify significant knowledge gaps, including the absence of definitive evidence for contemporary cross-species transmission versus shared ancestry or convergent evolution. We propose a strategic research agenda focused on longitudinal studies of human-animal cohorts, standardized metagenomic methodologies, and functional analyses of the virome. Elucidating the fecal virome at this interface is paramo

Fecal virome at the human-animal interface: a one health perspective on an uncharted frontier

Cuteri, Vincenzo
Primo
;
Preziuso, Silvia
Secondo
;
Laus, Fulvio
Ultimo
2026-01-01

Abstract

The exponential growth of the human population and associated intensifications in animal farming, pet ownership, and habitat anthropisation have dramatically increased human-animal interactions. Global livestock production now exceeds 24 billion animals annually, and pet ownership has risen to over 70% of households in many developed nations, creating unprecedented interfaces for viral exchange. This heightened contact has multiplied opportunities for zoonotic and reverse-zoonotic transmission, as tragically exemplified by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The fecal virome—defined as the totality of viral nucleic acids in the gastrointestinal tract—represents a crucial, yet largely unexplored, pathway for such exchanges. While the bacterial microbiome’s role is increasingly recognized, the virome’s composition, dynamics, and transmissibility between co-habiting humans and animals remain poorly characterized. This review compiles current evidence on the fecal virome of key domestic animals (equines, livestock, pets) and their human contacts under the “One Health” framework. We critically evaluate methodological approaches—from targeted PCR to viral metagenomics—and highlight the discovery of novel viruses and identification of zoonotic agents through metagenomic approaches. Critically, we identify significant knowledge gaps, including the absence of definitive evidence for contemporary cross-species transmission versus shared ancestry or convergent evolution. We propose a strategic research agenda focused on longitudinal studies of human-animal cohorts, standardized metagenomic methodologies, and functional analyses of the virome. Elucidating the fecal virome at this interface is paramo
2026
Animals; Fecal virome; Humans; One-health; Viral metagenomics; Zoonoses
262
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s42523-026-00569-2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.32 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11581/502244
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact