Human-related factors, including experience in animal handling and management, and knowledge of animal welfare are crucial to safeguard animal well-being. This study aimed to gain information on camel caretakers’ backgrounds, their perceptions of welfare, and possible associations with camel health and behavioural problems. Sixty-one workers were interviewed at the Birqash camel market in Cairo, Egypt. The interviewees were mainly young men (90.2% <50 years; P<0.001), from Egypt (96.7%; P<0.001), with more than 5 years of experience (93.4%, P<0.001), with a low educational level, who learned about camel handling and management from family and friends (78.7%; P<0.001). Eight were owners, 34 were caretakers and 19 were part-time workers who helped with management and sales operations (e.g., unloading) only on market days. Most of the interviewees judged their ability to identify a camel in distress/pain as “High” or “Very high” (62.3%; P=0.001), reporting monitoring camel eyes (52.6%) or feeding behaviour (42.1%). The interviewees’ understanding of animal welfare was, however, low, missing the overall meaning. Moreover, 7 interviewees (11.5%) did not know at all the meaning of animal welfare. In general, animal welfare was defined mainly referring to only two out of the four welfare principles (45.9%; P<0.001). Good feeding and good health were often considered, while good housing and appropriate behaviour were reported rarely. As expected, interviewees’ age, experience, and educational level were associated with the welfare status of the camels in their care, which often was under minimal standards. Education on camel behaviour and welfare is therefore recommended for all people who handle and manage camels.

Knowledge and perception of animal welfare at the camel market in Egypt

Menchetti, Laura
Ultimo
2024-01-01

Abstract

Human-related factors, including experience in animal handling and management, and knowledge of animal welfare are crucial to safeguard animal well-being. This study aimed to gain information on camel caretakers’ backgrounds, their perceptions of welfare, and possible associations with camel health and behavioural problems. Sixty-one workers were interviewed at the Birqash camel market in Cairo, Egypt. The interviewees were mainly young men (90.2% <50 years; P<0.001), from Egypt (96.7%; P<0.001), with more than 5 years of experience (93.4%, P<0.001), with a low educational level, who learned about camel handling and management from family and friends (78.7%; P<0.001). Eight were owners, 34 were caretakers and 19 were part-time workers who helped with management and sales operations (e.g., unloading) only on market days. Most of the interviewees judged their ability to identify a camel in distress/pain as “High” or “Very high” (62.3%; P=0.001), reporting monitoring camel eyes (52.6%) or feeding behaviour (42.1%). The interviewees’ understanding of animal welfare was, however, low, missing the overall meaning. Moreover, 7 interviewees (11.5%) did not know at all the meaning of animal welfare. In general, animal welfare was defined mainly referring to only two out of the four welfare principles (45.9%; P<0.001). Good feeding and good health were often considered, while good housing and appropriate behaviour were reported rarely. As expected, interviewees’ age, experience, and educational level were associated with the welfare status of the camels in their care, which often was under minimal standards. Education on camel behaviour and welfare is therefore recommended for all people who handle and manage camels.
2024
behaviour
caretakers
distress
dromedary camels
management
well-being
262
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Padalino_et_al__Cairo_market_survey__JCS_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 770.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
770.98 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11581/493824
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact