Composizione della lite e sussidiarietà costituzionale: per una rilettura della transazione in chiave euro-unitaria

The advent of the principle of horizontal subsidiarity has bestowed upon us a profound revelation of the immense potential for collective progress through individual contributions. As this principle takes root, the traditional dichotomy between the public and private realms begins to dissipate, giving way to a harmonious convergence of endeavours aimed at embodying our constitutional values. It is within this transformative landscape that the notion of convenience-based transactions emerges, serving as a catalyst for the pursuit of the greater good and social harmony. The pursuit of settlement, extending beyond mere material possessions, lies at the heart of resolving disputes a vital endeavour within the framework of the Euro-unitary source system. The very essence of this endeavour is underscored by a proactive and prescient examination of the agreement’s content, shaping the transaction itself. Such regulation serves a greater purpose by promoting a broad expansion of regulatory autonomy, yielding significant ramifications on the extraordinary nature of invalidating transactions and the intricate interplay between transactions and judgments.