Abstract: Backgroundandobjectives: This paper addresses psychological resilience, a multidisciplinary theoretical construct with important practical implications for health sciences. Although many definitions have been proposed in several contexts, an essential understanding of the concept is still lacking up to now. This negatively affects comparisons among research results and makes objective measurementdifficult. Theaimofthisreviewistoidentifysharedelementsindefiningtheconstructof resilienceacrosstheliteratureexaminedinordertomovetowardaconceptualunificationoftheterm. Materialsandmethods: Aliteraturereviewwasperformedusingtheelectronicdatabases‘PubMed’and ‘PsycINFO’.ScientificstudieswritteninEnglishbetween2002andMay2019wereincludedaccording tothefollowingkeyterms: ‘Psychological’,‘resilience’,and‘definition’. Results: Thereviewidentifies five macro-categories that summarize what has been reported in the recent literature concerning the resilience phenomenon. They serve as a preliminary and necessary step toward a conceptual clarification of the construct. Conclusions: We propose a definition of psychological resilience as the ability to maintain the persistence of one’s orientation towards existential purposes. It constitutes a transversal attitude that can be understood as the ability to overcome the difficulties experienced in thedifferentareasofone’slifewithperseverance,aswellasgoodawarenessofoneselfandone’sown internal coherence by activating a personal growth project. The conceptual clarification proposed will contribute to improving the accuracy of research on this topic by suggesting future paths of investigation aimed at deeply exploring the issues surrounding the promotion of resilience resources.

Towards a Transversal Definition of Psychological Resilience: A Literature Review

Giovanna Ricci;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Abstract: Backgroundandobjectives: This paper addresses psychological resilience, a multidisciplinary theoretical construct with important practical implications for health sciences. Although many definitions have been proposed in several contexts, an essential understanding of the concept is still lacking up to now. This negatively affects comparisons among research results and makes objective measurementdifficult. Theaimofthisreviewistoidentifysharedelementsindefiningtheconstructof resilienceacrosstheliteratureexaminedinordertomovetowardaconceptualunificationoftheterm. Materialsandmethods: Aliteraturereviewwasperformedusingtheelectronicdatabases‘PubMed’and ‘PsycINFO’.ScientificstudieswritteninEnglishbetween2002andMay2019wereincludedaccording tothefollowingkeyterms: ‘Psychological’,‘resilience’,and‘definition’. Results: Thereviewidentifies five macro-categories that summarize what has been reported in the recent literature concerning the resilience phenomenon. They serve as a preliminary and necessary step toward a conceptual clarification of the construct. Conclusions: We propose a definition of psychological resilience as the ability to maintain the persistence of one’s orientation towards existential purposes. It constitutes a transversal attitude that can be understood as the ability to overcome the difficulties experienced in thedifferentareasofone’slifewithperseverance,aswellasgoodawarenessofoneselfandone’sown internal coherence by activating a personal growth project. The conceptual clarification proposed will contribute to improving the accuracy of research on this topic by suggesting future paths of investigation aimed at deeply exploring the issues surrounding the promotion of resilience resources.
2019
262
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RESILIENZA.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 414.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
414.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11581/430534
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 207
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 176
social impact