L’architettura si adatta. Azioni di manipolazione del costruito a gerarchia crescente di alterazione nell’analogia tra città contemporanea e i luoghi della ricostruzione post sisma.

The definition of strategic planning able to describe a growing hierarchy of alterations of the preexistent, to define a progression of the grades of tran­sformation, leads to the distinction of different categories of manipulation and different operators. However, inside an urban resoanable scenery as immense ruins, in which incomplete and abandoned fragments coexist, namely the re­fusal of the cities that is built (or tries to build itself), the ruins of the city of the story that identified in archeological sites or in the vestiges of historical monuments, as well as ruins from the late Modern, does still make sense to distinguish the project or renovation of a building from the project of the buil­ding? It is still necessary the distinction among the restorers, only guardians of the knowledge of some techniques able to scientifically solve the conflicts that every intervention of recovery involves, and “creative” architects.