In recent decades, opportunities for public participation have been limited in urban-planning experiences for reasons of economic savings as well. One unintended effect is that local knowledge is underrepresented in final decisions. This tendency is amplified by the fact that planners tend to view the participation of interested parties as a question of procedure and process management, often as a passkey to be agreed upon, rather than a necessary conversation (or better yet, controversy) about local problems and solutions. It would instead be interesting to investigate how urban planning can benefit from organized forms of participation in which strength is given to the representation of diversity and conflict rather than looking for similarities and affinities.
Quality of Governance and Quality of Life
Massimo Sargolini
2018-01-01
Abstract
In recent decades, opportunities for public participation have been limited in urban-planning experiences for reasons of economic savings as well. One unintended effect is that local knowledge is underrepresented in final decisions. This tendency is amplified by the fact that planners tend to view the participation of interested parties as a question of procedure and process management, often as a passkey to be agreed upon, rather than a necessary conversation (or better yet, controversy) about local problems and solutions. It would instead be interesting to investigate how urban planning can benefit from organized forms of participation in which strength is given to the representation of diversity and conflict rather than looking for similarities and affinities.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Quality+of+Life+in+Urban+Landscapes_chap_massimo.pdf
solo gestori di archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
669.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
669.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.