In the field of private law, the judicial decisions assume a primary role for the development of law with the collaboration of legal science. The latter assumes both a control function and above all a propulsive function of precedents. The dialogical technique, however, adopted by the judges, regardless of the methodological dangers resulting from the intertwining of the theoretical-dogmatic and practical trainers, is capable of conferring a “seal” of scientific decision-making. The relationship between legal science and Supreme Court is analyzed within three symptomatic examples.
Esercizi dottrinali nella giurisprudenza italiana in materia contrattuale
FAVALE Rocco
2020-01-01
Abstract
In the field of private law, the judicial decisions assume a primary role for the development of law with the collaboration of legal science. The latter assumes both a control function and above all a propulsive function of precedents. The dialogical technique, however, adopted by the judges, regardless of the methodological dangers resulting from the intertwining of the theoretical-dogmatic and practical trainers, is capable of conferring a “seal” of scientific decision-making. The relationship between legal science and Supreme Court is analyzed within three symptomatic examples.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Favale R., Esercizi dottrinali nella giurisprudenza italiana in materia contrattuale - 2020.pdf
solo gestori di archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
4.3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.3 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.