According to the literature, the critical analysis that has developed due to the economical-financial crisis that began in 2008 has now led to an understanding of how old industrial cities are addressing the austerity measures adopted by by national governments. These policies have often included big cuts to spending for local institutions, processes to privatize public properties, and the transfer or reduction of administrative duties previously assigned to the municipalities. But while it is clear that urban decline is the origin of strong recessive trends, we still do not understand why islands of prosperity survive even in the most hard-hit cities, and why, in every single country, the gap between the performance supplied by the different agglomerations is still increasing. This inability to interpret the deepest roots of the urban crisis and its tendency to be connected to the controversial effects of the economic/financial crisis and climate change have likely led to the contemporary debate in urban planning fluctuating between the need to develop new large-scale, long-term plans and the urgency to experiment with urban tactics on a local, short-term basis. Because of this lack of knowledge, urban-planning tactics and long term strategies are still perceived as opposing formulas. At the same time, we cannot help but observe that recent contributions are starting to outline new models of intervention that propose original combinations of two different approaches. The first is a more traditional, normative method, with a neater representation of space, while the second relates to more temporary, less stringent regulations that can contribute to the creation of open-source urban planning. This implies bottom-up planning in which citizens actively contribute to pursuing more ambitious goals than what traditional territorial governing procedures are able to achieve. One example is the study of and search for effective solutions to urban shrinkage, climate change, and the abandonment of vast territories to degradation and crime, as well as the recovery of urban empty spaces for collective use. The attempt to overcome the traditional dichotomy between different planning scales and between general planning and sectoral disciplines is also moving in the same direction.

UN NUOVO CICLO DELLA PIANIFICAZIONE URBANISTICA TRA TATTICA E STRATEGIA / A NEW CYCLE OF URBAN PLANNING BETWEEN TACTIC AND STRATEGY

Michele Talia
2016-01-01

Abstract

According to the literature, the critical analysis that has developed due to the economical-financial crisis that began in 2008 has now led to an understanding of how old industrial cities are addressing the austerity measures adopted by by national governments. These policies have often included big cuts to spending for local institutions, processes to privatize public properties, and the transfer or reduction of administrative duties previously assigned to the municipalities. But while it is clear that urban decline is the origin of strong recessive trends, we still do not understand why islands of prosperity survive even in the most hard-hit cities, and why, in every single country, the gap between the performance supplied by the different agglomerations is still increasing. This inability to interpret the deepest roots of the urban crisis and its tendency to be connected to the controversial effects of the economic/financial crisis and climate change have likely led to the contemporary debate in urban planning fluctuating between the need to develop new large-scale, long-term plans and the urgency to experiment with urban tactics on a local, short-term basis. Because of this lack of knowledge, urban-planning tactics and long term strategies are still perceived as opposing formulas. At the same time, we cannot help but observe that recent contributions are starting to outline new models of intervention that propose original combinations of two different approaches. The first is a more traditional, normative method, with a neater representation of space, while the second relates to more temporary, less stringent regulations that can contribute to the creation of open-source urban planning. This implies bottom-up planning in which citizens actively contribute to pursuing more ambitious goals than what traditional territorial governing procedures are able to achieve. One example is the study of and search for effective solutions to urban shrinkage, climate change, and the abandonment of vast territories to degradation and crime, as well as the recovery of urban empty spaces for collective use. The attempt to overcome the traditional dichotomy between different planning scales and between general planning and sectoral disciplines is also moving in the same direction.
2016
9788899237059
284
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11581/405885
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact